Facebook users dont understand copyrights
On Facebook, users may see posts about new guidelines and privacy settings. These posts declare that all information posted by that user is copyrighted property. For once, many are regretting having blindly agreed to the terms and conditions attached to the creation of a social media account.
These posts that attempt at legal jargon are ineffective and merely paranoid attempts at making an appearance of control on a website that opened itself up to stock traders in May.
At the basic level, the rights of privacy have not changed since the company began to sell shares. On Facebooks statement of rights and responsibilities, along with other text often ignored by Facebook users, is the statement: You retain the copyright to your content. When you upload your content, you grant us a license to use and display that content.
Facebook states that the information users post have their own copyright, and it is redundant to post any sort of declaration stating ones ownership of content posted. Users posts are only spam clogging up the newsfeed for others on Facebook.
To illustrate just how many of these posts are misinformed, one should probably look up the Berner Convention, as some of the posts refer to it for their basis for copyright. Many of the people reposting dont realize that this is not even a real thing, but an uneducated attempt in referring to the Berne Convention, which grants copyrights to literary, cinematic and architectural works in specific countries.
A more effective form of voicing concern, instead of posting misinformed declarations, would be to visit the Facebook Site Governance page, on which users can vote and comment on proposed changes. That is something the makers of Facebook will actually take into consideration not an illegitimate post buried on an individual timeline.
In fact, one of its latest Site Governance posts deals with changing Facebooks current voting system by which users help determine the sites policies.
If a person is concerned about the privacy of information on Facebook, he or she should reconsider the privacy settings on his or her profile. Whether one has a copyright from Facebook or a self-issued one on a post, if information can be viewed publically, it is still getting out.
The fact of the matter is, if one was concerned about information being confidential, then it probably shouldnt have been put out in the open on the social media outlet in the first place. Facebook isnt exactly the Internets best-kept secret, and anything posted on it isnt going to be kept secret, either.
Alex Rosenthal is a freshman majoring in classics.
Get Top Stories Delivered Weekly
More usforacle News Articles
Recent usforacle News Articles
Discuss This Article
MOST POPULAR USFORACLE
GET TOP STORIES DELIVERED WEEKLY
FOLLOW OUR NEWSPAPER
LATEST USFORACLE NEWS
- AAC Player of the Year removed from USF softball
- Ethics committee opens investigation of SG president
- Student bands get chance for the big stage
- First all-ticket presidential debate brings calls for change
- The threat of empty promises
- Bulls enter critical final stretch
- Tampa design firm urges city to play
FROM AROUND THE WEB
- Protecting Seniors Online from Scams, Hacks and Tax Fraud
- Rehydrating for Optimal Health
- Five Reasons You Need Cell Phone Insurance Now
- The One Super Bowl Fact You Still May Not Know
- Companies Are Discovering That Pittsburgh Is Good for...
- Millennials Go House Hunting, and Here's What They Crave
- Estate Plans: You're Not Doing Anyone a Favor by Avoiding...
- What Would You Have to Give Up to Pay for An Unexpected...
- Four Tips to Keep Your Kids' Teeth Healthy And Clean
- Local Community Newspapers Go Digital
COLLEGE PRESS RELEASES
- N. American Effie Awards Announces 2017 Collegiate Effie Competition
- Students Increasingly Turn To GoFundMe To Pay For College
- O2 BARS: LATEST RAGE AT COLLEGE DE-STRESS, SOCIAL, & WELLNESS EVENTS
- Deadline Approaching for Phi Kappa Phi Study Abroad Grants
- ESA Foundation launches 2017-18 Scholarship Program