Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Hernandez, executive branch should be praised

Published: Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Updated: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 00:08

Last Thursday, USF Student Government (SG) announced it will host a U.S. Senate debate in late October, only a week before the general election. The nationally televised, on-campus debate will be held in partnership with CNN and the St. Petersburg Times.

This honor was granted to the University through the assistance of the SG executive branch. By accomplishing the feat, student body President Cesar Hernandez's administration has begun to honor his campaign pledge to promote a more politically active campus and attract political attention to USF. 

Unfortunately, however, Hernandez's term has been marred by petty SG politics even though it has already produced excellent results. During the summer, there was a flare up between the Senate and the executive branch over the confirmation of Nicole Kummer for an administration job.

Kummer initially sought the associate director for state affairs position, but her application was passed on, and she was instead considered for coordinator for resident life, a job for which she was more qualified. That, though, is a violation of policy.

Khalid Hassouneh, chair of the committee on rules who voted against Kummer, said to The Oracle that the application process "is there for a reason."

She was eventually denied the job.

Other SG candidates, however, were confirmed by the Senate under similar circumstances. Why was Kummer held back while others were not? The inconsistency doesn't reflect well on the Senate.

Her situation was not the only chapter of this saga. An anonymous grievance was filed recently against Hernandez and Vice President Spencer Montgomery over the hiring of Brett Farrar as Bulls Radio director.

The grievance contends, among other things, that Farrar is "not qualified" for the position. Although the Senate previously confirmed him for the job, it's now investigating the grievance.

USF students shouldn't be shocked. It seems like this kind of petty bickering happens in SG every year. Even so, it is unfortunate that the Senate is selectively preventing Hernandez from assembling the best possible team for his administration.

Consider the extraordinary work the executive branch has done even before the start of classes: they reached out to U.S. Senate candidates who are significant on a national level and convinced them to come to USF — bringing Washington politics right to Tampa for the benefit of the student body. Beyond that, they managed to get the entire spectacle broadcast across America.

The student body should appreciate and cooperate with Hernandez's administration, and the Senate should not stymie him over petty issues. He has already done incredible work for USF, and there is every reason to believe he will continue to do so.

Vincent DeFrancesco is a junior majoring in mass communications.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

7 comments

Anonymous
Wed Aug 25 2010 17:32
Nicole Kummer and myself are tight. First off, Kummer has lived on campus going on her third year now. And not only did she have a letter of rec from the Dean of Students and a senior RA, but had a meeting with the Dean of Housing who was excited to work with her. So clearly Kummer had the necessary qualifications to be successful in this position. She was attacked from the beginning and it had nothing to do with her but the Senate had a problem with Exec and then took it out on Kummer. TEAM KUMMER :)
Anonymous
Wed Aug 25 2010 10:13
Every year its the same thing only the names change. Student Govt is corrupt and it does not matter what "do gooder" wins each year.
Anonymous
Wed Aug 25 2010 02:18
Wow this Senator is a mad hater or a wuss lol! I wonder who elected this dude or female? If you can't praise the president what has the Anonymous Senator done?
Anonymous
Tue Aug 24 2010 23:53
shawty got a donk
Patricia
Tue Aug 24 2010 14:28
BAHAHAHAH at Anonymous. lmfao, totally true.
USF Graduate
Tue Aug 24 2010 10:38
Petty bickering? Rules, like the application process, exist for a reason. The fact that certain individuals were granted their positions under circumstances that may be in violation of established rules does not mean that the rules no longer apply!
Anonymous
Tue Aug 24 2010 01:34
Before I get comments against this comment, yes, I am a Senator, and yes, I was well-informed when I decided to vote no on the Nicole Kummer vote. The executive branch is sketchy, the people that they hire are their friends, and they don't always appoint the most qualified person to be on the job.
Cesar Hernandez, although I have nothing against him, should NOT BE PRAISED. I don't praise a man when he watches his wife give birth. Why would I praise Cesar for watching his friends get positions when they are most definitely friends of him and people that worked directly with his campaign.
Futhermore, for the author of this to write that Nicole Kummer was more qualified for a position should be taken with a grain of salt. Kummer has lived on campus for one year, and has never been an RA, she was a mayor on Building Hall Council. Whoop-de-doo. The position wasn't even advertised to RA's. Nor was it really advertised much at all. One would think that someone that is higher up on the scale would have a better perspective on what goes on in the residence halls and what is happening than one that doesn't even live in one. And I don't think that the Senate did wrong by finally putting their foot down in that kind of situation, where it kept on happening again and again. None of the other applications were passed on, and it is too little too late to go back and fix the ones that have been.
If you praise Cesar over this, it's pretty much giving him your permission to break rules, and get away with them. I don't give a kid a cookie for coloring on the walls, why would I praise Cesar for breaking the rules?!






log out