Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Campus organization loses funding, student leader over sexuality dispute

Published: Monday, October 31, 2011

Updated: Tuesday, November 1, 2011 08:11

Elizabeth Gutheim-Bryant considered herself very religious.

Bryant, a junior, was the president of her high school Christian organization and led her church youth groups every Sunday. She said she was proud of her religion, and wasn't afraid to let people know it. She is majoring in religious studies and psychology and joined a Christian student organization as soon as she came to campus.

She is also bisexual.

Proving the two aren't mutually exclusive has been a more daunting task than expected, she said. It resulted in the stripping of $3,824.48 in funds from the student organization she once considered her family.

Bryant said she joined Chi Alpha Christian Fellowship after enrolling as a freshman, not knowing anyone on campus.

"Everyone was so welcoming," she said. "When I came here as a freshman, I became friends with all of them."

Yet, the friendships didn't last when she came out as a bisexual to the leaders of the group this September, she said.

After being sent to the organization's pastor, Rev. Chris Kennedy, Bryant was told she was no longer fit to serve as a leader because of her sexuality.

"I got lectured for an hour about how I should pray to God to change my heart," Bryant said. "Sitting there and having someone tell me the way I believe God made me is a sin, that really hurts."

Kennedy, who said to The Oracle that he did not wish to comment on the issue, wrote an email to Bryant explaining why she had been deemed unfit to serve as a leader.

"From our perspective, homosexuality is clearly a sin," he wrote. "Although none of us is without sin, the attitude of participating in sinful activity willingly and unrepentantly is the issue. It would be no different if a heterosexual student leader were sleeping with their boyfriend or girlfriend. As a Christian ministry, we do not allow people to be in leadership who are engaging in, or affirming as acceptable by God, behaviors such as fornication, adultery or homosexuality. All of these activities are clearly prohibited by God's Word (the Bible)."

Kennedy told Bryant she was welcome to attend public meetings, but that her "beliefs and behavior" were not in line with the organization.

Chi Alpha's constitution contains the non-discriminatory policy that all student organizations funded by student-paid Activity and Service (A&S) fees are required to adopt under Statute 802.1 of the Student Government (SG) Constitution.

It states the organization is "open and available to all students to attend and become members regardless of race, color, marital status, sex, religion, national origin, disability, age or sexual orientation."

Yet, when Bryant filed a grievance against the organization in September through SG, Chi Alpha president Nathan Rakes, who also declined to comment, argued that the organization was not in violation of its constitution.

Rakes said the constitution allows the organization to dismiss a leader who is in violation of its expectations.

"(Bryant) was fully aware of the expectations of Chi Alpha Christian Fellowship in the fact that we are a Christian organization. Therefore, we rely and act in accordance with the Bible, which clearly states that homosexuality is a sin," he wrote in an email to SG. "As a leader, she failed in her responsibility to keep the commands of the Holy Scriptures (the Bible), which, therefore, let her be subject to removal according to our constitution."

Bryant, who said she's read the Bible multiple times, said the stance is a matter of interpretation.

"It's kind of sad," she said. "Christianity is supposed to be about love."

SG Senate President Khalid Hassouneh said SG, which last week withdrew Chi Alpha's funding for the remainder of the year, acted to uphold the laws of the SG constitution.

Hassouneh said that if Chi Alpha changed its stance on this issue, as well as two other violations against the organization for hiring a non-USF affiliated pastor with A&S funds, they would immediately be eligible to reapply for funding.

"Our interest is not to strip any organization of A&S funding or have any kind of negative ramification for any organization, but they are state funds that we're talking about," he said. "There are certain requirements that have to be followed. It really is the money of the students, and every student should have the right to access something they paid for."

Hassouneh said SG's anti-discriminatory policies mirror those of the University and the Florida Board of Governors.

"Sadly, some of this stuff is only found out after the fact, when a grievance is brought to our attention," he said. "It's very hard to actively monitor all 300 organizations that are A&S-funded."

Bryant said she didn't want to file a lawsuit. After leaving Chi Alpha, she said she has been looking for another group that won't judge her, though she is not in much of a hurry.

"I've backed off from the religion aspect a little bit because I don't like the politics involved," she said. "I believe I can still have a relationship with God without going to a church."

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

9 comments

Anonymous
Mon Nov 7 2011 03:28
I would just like to point out that the organization did not in fact kick Ms. Bryant out of Chi Alpha. They said she was more than welcome to continue attending public meetings. She was asked to resign her leadership position, not her rights to attend. The organization has the right to run themselves as they see fit, and they chose the Bible as their foundation(good choice, in my own personal opinion)... The Bible clearly states that homosexuality of ANY degree, especially from a Believer is a sin. Ephesians 5:3 states: :But among you there must not be even a hint of sexual immorality, or of any kind of impurity, or of greed, because these are improper for God's holy people." People ask, "Well is that a choice or were they born that way?". The answer is, both. Every human being (after Adam and Eve) were born with a sin nature. it's inescapable and the exact reason why we need Jesus. He was(and is, and will be) our perfect sacrifice to gain forgiveness. It's also a choice however, because the Bible says it is. What Ms. Bryant fails to realize is that ALL Scripture was 'inspired' by God. That does not mean some random guy was 'inspired by God' so he wrote the New Testament. No. It means the Holy Spirit came upon those chosen by God, and God told them exactly what to write, word for word, every jot and tittle. If she chooses to only believe a portion here and a portion there, she basically promotes the idea of relativity. The problem with that is the fact that the Bible is Absolute Truth, therfore having no room for relativity. Also, I believe I saw some comments about Old Testament Scriptures that were deemed irrelevant. I agree and this is why: When Jesus came, He said that the Old Testament Law was fulfilled through Him. (please see: http://www.rationalchristianity.net/abolish_law.html) All those references made about Leviticus and Exodus laws are completely irrelevant because if you truly are a Christian, you would believe what Jesus says. That is the criteria for labeling yourself as a "Christian". You must be a person who wishes to be Christ-like and that will uphold what he taught and believe Him. Ms. Bryant, I would like to ask you one thing: How can you knowingly and willing cause the discontinuation of funding for a Christian organization, especially when all they did was request you discontinue leadership status becasue you didn't uphold their standards of a leader? The Bible also says that a leader must be above reproach, not giving in to sexual or any other sin. Straight, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender... I don't care who you are, if your name isn't Jesus of Nazareth, the Son of God, The Christ, then you have sinned. According to Romans 3:23 "For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God." And God(through Paul) clearly states in 1 Timothy 1:8-11 that "8 We know that the law is good if one uses it properly. 9 We also know that the law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and irreligious, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, 10 for the sexually immoral, for those practicing homosexuality, for slave traders and liars and perjurers-and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine 11 that conforms to the gospel concerning the glory of the blessed God, which he entrusted to me.". Also see 1 Corinthians 6:18
"Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a person commits are outside the body, but whoever sins sexually, sins against their own body." and Ephesians 5:3
"But among you there must not be even a hint of sexual immorality, or of any kind of impurity, or of greed, because these are improper for God's holy people.:"

Just some food for thought...

Anonymous
Thu Nov 3 2011 15:22
"She is a wack job and USF has no right to tell any organization how to direct it's self governing leadership."

This hurts my brain.

"Politica Correctness is destroying this Nation. Where can I sent a donation to the Chi Alpha Christian Fellowship. "

I don't even...what?

Anonymous
Thu Nov 3 2011 13:19
Hey Joe - why don't you paste that in about 10 other places to make sure everyone can see it?

I would enjoy reading the statute of the SG Constitution that governs how the LEADERSHIP of student organizations is run? Being a former Attorney General at USF... i know of NONE. This student was not kicked out of the organization, she was simply removed from the leadership because it was felt by the organization that she was not living up to the standards of someone in their LEADERSHIP POSITIONS, not their membership.

This is a personal request for the statute governing the inner workings of A&S funded organizations at USF. Miss Bryant was still free to be a member of the organization. What else was required of the organization BY THE STATUTES? I do not want an opinion. I do not want the previous statute stated, which refers only to MEMBERSHIP - not the occupation of a Leadership Role.

Please Reply

Don'tBeDumb
Wed Nov 2 2011 18:16
This isn't about politics or political correctness. This is about the law. The situation would be the same if the campus Democratic club refused to allow a Republican to join. Organizations can be governed by whatever guidelines they think are appropriate, but the law of the State of Florida and university policy trumps all of that at least where funding is concerned. SG isn't trying to run these groups. It's simply saying that A&S fees won't be used to fund discriminatory practices.
Anonymous
Wed Nov 2 2011 14:02
You can donate at this following site: http://xausf.com/Donate.html
Anonymous
Wed Nov 2 2011 09:49
I'm an alum of USF, and I'm also bisexual. She said she is bisexual. She didn't say homosexual. So why is this organization bringing up its views on homosexuality? She's not a homosexual. What does the Bible say about bisexuality? Nothing.
I'm not saying it would have been okay for them to discriminate against her if she was gay. That would also be wrong, but for different reasons. But she's not gay, so this makes no sense whatsoever. Bi is not the same as gay.
The SG did the right thing, and she should sue this organization for biphobic discrimination.
Anonymous
Tue Nov 1 2011 18:58
She is a wack job and USF has no right to tell any organization how to direct it's self governing leadership. She knew exactly what Chi Alpha was all about, but instead made it into a political issue by stabbing the pastor in the back and the organization that clearly is governed by the Bible. How can any student organization feel free to operate on the USF campus if they will have to worry about disgruntled students whining over leadership expectations and then having a spineless SG organization bow to political pressure. Really?
Anonymous
Tue Nov 1 2011 16:05
Politica Correctness is destroying this Nation. Where can I sent a donation to the Chi Alpha Christian Fellowship.
Joe Piervincenti
Tue Nov 1 2011 13:32
Once again, we have a glaring indictment that the rights of individuals and their characteristics, are just not being respected nor observed. It is my considered opinion that what USF needs are to make a few examples of prosecution and discipline through the Office of Diversity and publisize them well to announce to the University population that this must stop. From race, to gender, to age, to nationality, to religion the madness continues.




log out